“Social Marketing Key Concepts and Principles” è un corso online autogestito di tre moduli sempre disponibile e che può essere studiato ad un ritmo che si adatta alle esigenze degli studenti.
Objectif : La Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) a voulu établir un bilan des premiers mois de fonctionnement de son nouveau processus d’implication des patients dans l’évaluation des médicaments et des dispositifs médicaux (débuté en novembre 2016), qui repose sur des contributions écrites transmises par les associations de patients et d’usagers.Méthodes : Différentes sources d’information ont été mobilisées : définition et suivi de données, comparaison avec les autres processus de contribution au sein de la HAS, partage de pratiques avec les homologues étrangers, discussion avec les associations, les industriels, les évaluateurs (membres des services et des commissions d’évaluation).Résultats : Sur les 75 médicaments mis en ligne, 25 ont fait l’objet de contributions lors des six premiers mois. Le Collège de la HAS a défini en septembre 2017 trois ajustements pour améliorer la procédure : extension des délais pour contribuer, présentation systématique des contributions en commission avant délibération, publication des contributions. Des enjeux ont été identifiés pour la suite, notamment la possibilité de fournir plus d’informations aux associations pour contribuer, ou encore l’hypothèse d’une utilisation des contributions par les évaluateurs en amont, au stade de l’évaluation-instruction et pas seulement à celui de l’évaluation-appréciation (délibération de la commission).Conclusions : Les méthodes utilisées présentaient des avantages complémentaires et ont permis de définir des ajustements et d’identifier des enjeux pour ce nouveau processus. Des données de fonctionnement doivent être recueillies en routine. La comparaison des processus d’implication et les discussions avec les acteurs se font plutôt dans le cadre d’études ou de projets d’amélioration dédiés.
1 - Ciclo sostenibile Con il progetto Ciclo Sostenibile ci poniamo come obiettivo quello di promuovere l’utilizzo di alternative sostenibili al classico assorbente usa e getta. Per arrivare ad un cambiamento nei comportamenti delle donne sarà necessario passare anche per l’informazione, per far conoscere l’esistenza di queste….
But you shouldn't believe them. While this latest work represents excellent science — a prospective cohort observational study, in scientific parlance — it's just one study. And when you look at a single study, you're getting only one piece of the puzzle, one interpretation of the research question, one idea about how to run a scientific experiment.
In this case, the study population was not randomly assigned to eat more whole grains, which means we can't know whether the people who ate them are healthier because of their diet or because of other traits they share, like their age, ethnicity, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity levels, multivitamin use, and family medical history.
È nato tutto per caso qualche settimana fa, mai avremmo immaginato di riuscire a far tipizzare (ovvero far iscrivere al registro mondiale donatori midollo osseo) 32 persone in meno di due ore! Per alcuni potrà sembrare un piccolo risultato, ma per un mini evento realizzato in un corridoio d'ospedale è un ottimo risultato: sono 32 possibilità in più di salvare la vita a qualcuno! È solo l'inizio e ci sarà sempre strada da fare, ma questa sera andiamo a dormire con il sorriso
Ecco, proprio da qui parte il nostro progetto. Siamo otto ragazzi di Compass iscritti al corso di Marketing Sociale tenuto dal professor Fattori che, dopo un’attenta analisi della questione HIV, hanno deciso di mobilitarsi sul tema. Considerando la fascia d’età sopracitata, abbiamo individuato negli studenti dell’Università di Bologna il nostro target primario e, compiendo una ricerca approfondita sul territorio bolognese, abbiamo individuato nella BLQ Checkpoint il partner ideale, data la loro esperienza decennale, la loro sensibilità e la loro efficienza.
Questa pagina è gestita da un gruppo di studenti dell'Università di Bologna che stanno portando avanti una campagna di Marketing Sociale. Tale campagna ha come obiettivo primario quello di sensibilizzare le persone rispetto al tema dell'HPV, in collaborazione con il reparto di ginecologia ed ostetricia del Policlinico S.Orsola (Bologna). Negli ultimi anni è disponibile un test per l’identificazione del virus e da gennaio 2008 è disponibile una vaccinazione GRATUITA per le ragazze nel dodicesimo anno di vita. Questa pagina ha l'obiettivo di informare e sensibilizzare in merito a questa grande opportunità.
Prevenire è meglio che curare.
AIUTACI A CONDIVIDERE, DIFFONDI IL MESSAGGIO INSIEME A NOI #previenihpv
Whenever I talk to physicians about outcomes that are worse than you’d expect, they are quick to point out that noncompliance — when a patient does not follow a course of treatment — is a major problem.
Sometimes prescriptions aren’t filled. Other times they are, but patients don’t take the drugs as prescribed. All of this can lead to more than 100,000 deaths a year.
A thorough review published in The New England Journal of Medicine about a decade ago estimated that up to two-thirds of medication-related hospital admissions in the United States were because of noncompliance, at a cost of about $100 billion a year. These included treatments for H.I.V., high blood pressure, mental health and childhood illnesses (it can be difficult to get children to take their medicine, too).
To address the issue, researchers have been trying various strategies, including those rooted in behavioral economics. So far, there hasn’t been much progress. A systematic review published five years ago in Annals of Internal Medicine looked at all kinds of trials that tried to improve patient compliance. It found some limited successes in improving patient compliance in different disorders, but most of the trials were small and not easily generalized outside the research setting.
The writings of a sixteenth century French teenager may seem a stretch for a public health readership, but Etienne de la Boétie's treatise on Voluntary Servitude explains why unjust systems prevail and how they can be changed. They prevail, he shows, because we let them (the losers always vastly outnumber the winners); and they change when we retract our permission (as Ghandi demonstrated). These vital insights have inspired progress down the centuries – the enlightenment philosophers, the French Revolution, Tolstoy, the American civil rights movement as well as the Indian struggle against the British Empire. In an era when widening inequalities have become all too apparent, and the harm this does to the commonweal much better understood, this paper argues that La Boétie's analysis retains all its power and can inspire a new vision for public health.
The FATH (Fundación Argentina de Trasplante Hepático) and DDB Argentina present “The man and the dog”, a story of friendship that seeks to inspire people to become organ donors.
La pagina Facebook “Salviamo Elisa” creata dai genitori della piccola bisognosa di un trapianto di midollo osseo ha solo 11.182 “mi piace”, ma il messaggio è stato così forte che sul social network (ma anche in tv e alla radio) tutti, da personaggi famosi, a normali utenti, si sono mobilitati per diffondere la richiesta d’aiuto: per salvarla c’è bisogno dello sforzo di molti, infatti c’è solo una possibilità di compatibilità su 100 mila perché il trapianto vada a buon fine.
Written, compiled and edited by Julie Hentz, Florence Sécula and Fernanda Lica Note: with this last newsletter of 2021, the iSMA would like to look back at the highlights of the year in the field of social marketing with the end of year review by iSMA President Jeff French.
Social Marketing in different languages and cultures
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele Griffith Australia; Dewitte Siegfried Belgium; Kara Chan Denmark; Jeff French Englad; Giuseppe Fattori Italy; Janet Davey New Zealand; Suzanne Suggs Switzerland; Carol Bryant U.S.A.; Nedra Kline U.S.A.
In aggiornamento continuo, potete segnalare errori o Università da inserire a giuseppe.fattori@unibo.it
We hear it all the time: Americans pay more for health care than other developed countries. Way more. Health care spending accounts for 16 percent of the economy in the US, while the OECD average is 8.9 percent.
What we don’t talk about as much is why. Americans don’t consume more health care than the Germans or the Japanese. We actually go to the doctor less often.
The real reason American health care is so expensive compared to other countries is that the prices are higher. We pay more for everything from angioplasties to C-sections, from hip replacements to opioids.
That’s because the private insurance companies that pay for most of these doctor visits, prescriptions, and procedures don’t have enough negotiating power. In other developed countries, the government is the one doing the negotiating, and it’s able to get lower prices.
To learn more about the challenges for the free market to regulate health care prices, check out the video above.
Progetto in collaborazione con Last Minute Market (http://www.lastminutemarket.it/) che si occupa dell'iniziativa Farmaco Amico.
Siamo un gruppo di studenti dell'Università di Bologna. Stiamo partecipando ad un progetto legato al corso di marketing sociale al fine di coinvolgere le persone in una campagna di sensibilizzazione per la raccolta e donazione di farmaci sul territorio bolognese.
I give many a chemical rush when they answer my call, 8-10 Americans believe I am addictive, and I can kill you if I'm misused. What am I? A cellphone, of course!
Thanks to cellphones, we are more connected than ever before, but disconnecting is also more painful. The following cartoons, as well as the 'Death Of Conversation' project by Babycakes Romero, illustrate some of the funny and not-so-funny side effects of our plugged-in lifestyle.
Do you think we're better off now that we all have smart-phones or not? How have cellphones impacted your life?
The Motion: This House Believes the Tobacco Industry is Morally Reprehensible. ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. It has been established for 189 years, aiming to promote debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.
Research in behavioral economics has shown that small changes in the environment can make it easier for people to act and make decisions that support their goals. The Behavioral Interventions to Advance Self-Sufficiency (BIAS) project, launched in 2010, was the first major project to apply behavioral insights to the human services programs that serve poor and vulnerable families in the United States. The goal of the project — sponsored by the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation of the Administration for Children and Families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and led by MDRC — was to learn how tools from behavioral science could be used to deliver program services more effectively and, ultimately, improve the well-being of low-income children, adults, and families. Following a systematic approach called behavioral diagnosis and design, 15 state and local agencies participated in the project, which consisted of identifying problems that are appropriate for behavioral interventions, designing interventions, and conducting rigorous tests — where appropriate — to determine whether the interventions improved outcomes. The team launched 15 tests of behavioral interventions, involving close to 100,000 clients, in eight of the participating agencies. These tests spanned three domains: child support, child care, and work support. While each intervention was customized to fit its context, all involved at least one of the behavioral principles described by the “SIMPLER” framework, which stands for social influence, implementation prompts, making deadlines, personalization, loss aversion, ease, and reminders. Evaluated through randomized controlled trials, all BIAS sites had at least one intervention with a statistically significant impact on a primary outcome of interest. The magnitude of the improvements typically ranged from 2 to 4 percentage points (in line with other behavioral research findings) — but, in several cases, impacts were much larger. These impacts may be considered large relative to the costs for the interventions, which ranged from $0.15 per person to $10.46 per person. The project’s findings suggest that small changes in, for instance, program outreach or the way that information is conveyed can help reduce some of the complexities that low-income populations face when they interact with human services agencies. While such “nudges” — defined as subtle and modest changes that help improve individual decision making — are shown to be an important aspect of the behavioral toolkit, the BIAS findings also suggest that it may be fruitful to extend the approach beyond program implementation to program design (at the local or state level) and policy formation (at the state or federal level). In this way, changes to program rules and agency practices may induce larger or longer-term changes in behavior among both clients and program staff.
Why health inequalities are a concern for social marketing. Health inequalities are systemic and avoidable unjust differences in health and wellbeing between groups of people or communities. Health inequality in England is already acute: males and females living in the most deprived areas can expect to have 19 fewer years of good health, compared with the least deprived, which means that, for 25 million people living in the more deprived areas of England, healthy life expectancy is lower than the current state pension age. People who are worse off are also less likely to have the financial and social resources to improve things for themselves. By contrast, wealthier (and, often healthier) people are more likely to actively seek out and engage with health information. We therefore need to focus our marketing programmes, and target tightly, to ensure they reach where they are most needed. This is not just about income and social class, although these are powerful; health inequality is also affected by ethnic and racial disparities, sexuality, gender and geography. Health inequality is a gradient, which means that it is not only the most deprived who suffer inequality: all but the wealthiest are affected.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.